Guaranteed Indigenous Council Positions on New Zealand Councils to Be Reduced by More Than Half
The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.
Background Information on Indigenous Representation
Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating local support and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.
Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions
To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.
However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.
Referendum Results
The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.
The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”
Opposition parties however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.
Urban-Rural Divide
The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.
“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”
Voter Turnout and Concerns
This year’s local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.
The process had been “a mockery”.
Comparative Treatment
Councils are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.
“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”
This remark referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.