🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I historically avoided heavy use of luck during my D&D games. I tended was for narrative flow and session development to be shaped by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. That said, I chose to change my approach, and I'm very happy with the result.

The Catalyst: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

A popular streamed game features a DM who regularly asks for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails selecting a polyhedral and outlining possible results contingent on the result. This is fundamentally no distinct from consulting a random table, these are devised in the moment when a player's action lacks a obvious resolution.

I opted to test this approach at my own table, mostly because it looked novel and presented a break from my normal practice. The results were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated balance between pre-determination and randomization in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable Story Beat

In a recent session, my party had survived a massive conflict. Afterwards, a cleric character wondered if two beloved NPCs—a sibling duo—had made it. In place of choosing an outcome, I let the dice decide. I asked the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: a low roll, both would perish; a middling roll, only one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a profoundly poignant sequence where the characters came upon the remains of their friends, still united in their final moments. The party held a ceremony, which was particularly meaningful due to earlier story developments. In a concluding gesture, I chose that the forms were strangely transformed, showing a enchanted item. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was exactly what the group lacked to resolve another pressing situation. You simply plan these kinds of perfect story beats.

Improving Your Improvisation

This incident made me wonder if improvisation and thinking on your feet are actually the core of D&D. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your improvisation muscles can rust. Groups frequently find joy in upending the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a skilled DM needs to be able to adapt swiftly and invent details in real-time.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a excellent way to develop these talents without going completely outside your comfort zone. The key is to apply them for low-stakes decisions that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to establish if the king's advisor is a traitor. Instead, I might use it to determine if the party reach a location right after a key action takes place.

Empowering Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also helps make players feel invested and cultivate the impression that the story is alive, evolving in reaction to their decisions in real-time. It prevents the feeling that they are merely characters in a pre-written story, thereby enhancing the shared aspect of storytelling.

Randomization has long been integral to the original design. Early editions were filled with encounter generators, which fit a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. While current D&D frequently emphasizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, this isn't always the required method.

Striking the Right Balance

It is perfectly no problem with being prepared. But, equally valid nothing wrong with letting go and permitting the whim of chance to decide some things instead of you. Control is a big part of a DM's job. We use it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to release it, in situations where doing so can lead to great moments.

My final advice is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Try a little chance for smaller outcomes. It may find that the organic story beat is infinitely more memorable than anything you could have pre-written in advance.